Changing a spacecraft’s circular orbit
8 marks · A-level · original practice case
Write your working and explanations below or on paper. Your responses stay in this page; PhysicsHelp does not submit or save them. Copy anything you want to keep before closing it. Check calculations separately from method marks. Use unrounded working between parts.
Exam mode: try every part before opening the rubric.
The situation
A spacecraft of mass 800 kg moves from a circular orbit of radius 7.00 × 106 m to a circular orbit of radius 1.40 × 107 m around a planet. The planet’s gravitational parameter GM is 3.99 × 1014 m³ s⁻². Treat the spacecraft mass as constant for the energy calculation and neglect drag. The proposed transfer has an available useful energy budget of 1.00 × 1010 J. This budget is a change in total orbital energy; it is not a rocket fuel-energy or manoeuvre model.
| Orbit | Radius from planet centre / m |
|---|---|
| Initial | 7.00 × 10^6 |
| Final | 1.40 × 10^7 |
Learn support
The kinetic energy changes as well as gravitational potential energy. Derive the circular-orbit speed from the radial force.
Part (a)
Calculate the spacecraft’s speed in the final orbit. [2 marks]
Give the numerical answer to 3 significant figures.
Part (b)
Determine the increase in total orbital energy. [3 marks]
Give the numerical answer to 3 significant figures.
Part (c)
Evaluate the claim that the stated budget is sufficient. [3 marks]
Marking rubric and worked answers
Indicative practice marks. Method marks assess valid working; accuracy marks require the associated valid method. Independent points stand on their own. Tick only points supported by your response. Do not award the same explanation twice. These ticks record your judgement, not an examiner’s result.
Part (a) marking points
Final answer: 5.34 × 103 m s⁻¹. Numerical checks assess the final value only; they do not check working or the number of digits typed.
No earlier numerical result is required. Credit a valid alternative method. Accuracy credit requires a physically valid method.
Part (b) marking points
Final answer: 1.14 × 1010 J. Numerical checks assess the final value only; they do not check working or the number of digits typed.
No earlier numerical result is required. Credit a valid alternative method. Accuracy credit requires a physically valid method.
Part (c) marking points
Credit a conclusion consistent with a numerical arithmetic error in part (b), provided the comparison and physical limitations are explained. Do not credit a potential-energy-only model as total orbital energy.
Self-assessed marks: 0 / 8
Report a problem with this case
Related skills
Scope and reference sources
AQA 3.7.2.3–3.7.2.4 and 3.4.1.7. The orbital-energy derivation is AQA-specific; this case is not presented as OCR A specification practice. These are shared original exercises; wording, indicative marks and difficulty have not been endorsed by either board.
AQA specification · OCR A specification
Case reference: orbital-transfer-budget · version 1.1.0 · seed 0. Choose another case